From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri,  9 Jun 2006 21:10:48 -0600
From: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@gmx.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] quantity vs. quality
Message-ID: <20060610031048.GA22538@ionkov.net>
References: <20060610025147.GA22339@ionkov.net>
	<6f5fd9d621754d33e66306c1373bf64b@quanstro.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6f5fd9d621754d33e66306c1373bf64b@quanstro.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 66f4fb88-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 07:45:40PM -0500, quanstro@quanstro.net said:
> i don't know if it's good code or bad code in general. i was pointing out that it is possible to
> catch a call to sysfatal and do something else, since you seemed to indicate that was
> not possible.

How can you find from _sysfatal what exactly caused the sysfatal and if you
in recoverable state or not?

	Lucho