From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <200607120926.k6C9QCU18153@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] OT: plan9port compilation failure In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:37:37 -0700." <1152585457.7683.49.camel@linux.site> References: <676c3c4f0607061319r25765e59pc566320f1b2d4e69@mail.gmail.com> <20060707033054.GB41711@mero.morphisms.net> <200607101526.k6AFQRc00844@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl> <1152585457.7683.49.camel@linux.site> From: Axel Belinfante MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <18147.1152696372.1@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl.cs.utwente.nl> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 11:26:12 +0200 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7d23fcd8-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > > I run it on sunos 5.8 and build it with sun cc (Sun WorkShop 6 C 5.1). > > Now, that is a pretty old piece of software. Is there any reason > you don't want to upgrade ? the sunos or the sun cc? I guess the sun cc was not upgraded because nobody really cared enough. for the usual c stuff it is ok (apart from those mis(sing) features of which you will see the consequences in the plan9port cvs logs), and those really caring here have probably been using gcc anyway. the number of suns here is pretty low now, I'm not sure upgrades would be considered worthwhile. most people switched to pc's with linux or windows, or occasional mac. this also changed how interchangeble the machines are. on the suns we only have the bare os locally, and all home dirs and (non-default) applications come from the fileservers. for the linux machines most applications are local too, which (potentially) makes them all different. that's not all. with the suns we had usually a single os version on all machines, or at most two at times of change. I think we have at least three versions of linux with some consequential shared lib incompatibilities. > > For the last year and a half I've been using (daily, including 9term) > > a plan9port that I built early january 2005. > > > > I've just rebuild plan9port from cvs (sunos 5.8, sun cc). > > I needed minor tweaks (like the threadimpl.h thing reported here, thx) > > I've not used much of it yet, some things (e.g. acme) do work, some not. > > Hm. It kinda works for me. At least things I care about. same here now. however, I do have the feeling that typing in the acme tags is now even slower than it already was. could this be a consequence of devdraw, or other changes? (my previous acme version was from early 2005). Also (but this is not new, I think?) in acme a single click to scroll sometimes results in multiple scrollings. when scrolling with b2 pressed the scrolling cannot keep up with the mouse moving and you see the mouse cursor being warped up or down into the scroll 'elevator' and (because of that?) the elevator jumps up and down and up while scrolling on its way up, or overshoots and scrolls back and forth until it is finally stable. this all on a sun blade 100 - maybe that is too slow a machine now? anyway, these are just little nits. I agree that on solaris it works pretty well, definitely those things I care about, and that's pretty impressive (especially impressive when considering what russ recently wrote). Axel.