From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 12:25:11 +0200 From: Harri Haataja Subject: Re: [9fans] why I'm messing with python: mercurial In-reply-to: <13426df10612232126p669bd6eaq1411e0546c5dcd7@mail.gmail.com> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Message-id: <20061224102511.GA13434@XTL.antioffline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline References: <13426df10612232126p669bd6eaq1411e0546c5dcd7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Topicbox-Message-UUID: f99c810e-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 10:26:07PM -0700, ron minnich wrote: > I feel that Plan 9 could stand to have a reasonable version control > system, which CVS certainly is not. Mecurial is written in python, is > working well for xen, so I thought I'd see if it would work at all in > python on plan9. My vote would go to darcs, but I think that the GHC runtime is quite far away :)