Re: [9fans] snoopy thinks that the cpu command talks 9p

["Alberto Cortés" <alcortes@it.uc3m.es>]

Russ Cox said:

> There's not really any good option here, since the interesting
> bits are encrypted, and saying ninep is not a lie, so I'm
> inclined just to leave it alone.  There's certainly no point in
> printing unknown("hello 9fans!"), since as I mentioned above,
> it's either 9P or encrypted 9P, never plain text.

It certainly have plain text on the first packet:

    p9 rc4_256 sha1

I am not sure if this is 9P.

And I have seen at least another packet that looks like "p9any
version 1" after that (not sure what I am saying, remember I am
trying to understand authentication with this experiment).

But then, I didn't get to the encrypted part :), and didn't know
about it so I guess you are rigth and there is no plain text
afterwards.

Labeling those first lines as whatever protocol they are can be
interesting.

-- 
Alberto Cortés