From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:08:39 +0100 From: Alberto =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cort=E9s?= To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] snoopy thinks that the cpu command talks 9p Message-ID: <20070116130839.GA20455@it.uc3m.es> References: <20070116115900.GA16784@it.uc3m.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Topicbox-Message-UUID: 040533fc-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Russ Cox said: > There's not really any good option here, since the interesting > bits are encrypted, and saying ninep is not a lie, so I'm > inclined just to leave it alone. There's certainly no point in > printing unknown("hello 9fans!"), since as I mentioned above, > it's either 9P or encrypted 9P, never plain text. It certainly have plain text on the first packet: p9 rc4_256 sha1 I am not sure if this is 9P. And I have seen at least another packet that looks like "p9any version 1" after that (not sure what I am saying, remember I am trying to understand authentication with this experiment). But then, I didn't get to the encrypted part :), and didn't know about it so I guess you are rigth and there is no plain text afterwards. Labeling those first lines as whatever protocol they are can be interesting. --=20 Alberto Cort=E9s