From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:44:31 -0500
From: Claudio Leite <leitec@bughlt.org>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] IPv6 router advertisements
Message-ID: <20070118084431.A2407@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG>
References: <20070117150621.B24320@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG>
	<4aa0555a8dedb6bbf9d1be8dcc8c0e3e@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <4aa0555a8dedb6bbf9d1be8dcc8c0e3e@plan9.bell-labs.com>;
	from geoff@plan9.bell-labs.com on Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 04:37:50PM
	-0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 05a693fe-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

* geoff@plan9.bell-labs.com (geoff@plan9.bell-labs.com) wrote:
> Having said that, we need a few more user-mode daemons to make IPv6
> run smoothly.  There are ipconfig6 and ping6 programs that aren't yet
> on sources.  ndb/cs knows how to place IPv6 calls and ndb/dns
> understands IPv6 addresses, so it's possible to configure the whole
> thing by hand, given ipconfig6.  We don't have fancy route
> advertisement daemons and the like yet.

It seems drawterm doesn't know about IPv6 yet, either, so I suppose it'd
be rather useless to me at the point. Basically, I'd like to make it
easier to access a Plan 9 machine that is behind a NAT in IPv4 but which
has its own v6 address. I wonder, how difficult would it be to v6-ify
drawterm? I might spring up to that task.

-Claudio