From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:44:32 -0500
From: William Josephson <jkw@eecs.harvard.edu>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Replacements for lex
Message-ID: <20070120084432.GC84021@mero.morphisms.net>
References: <7871fcf50701191058w7ef924cer224b9c8e4f63321b@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7871fcf50701191058w7ef924cer224b9c8e4f63321b@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 06896396-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 01:58:06PM -0500, Joel Salomon wrote:
> For languages sufficiently like C, is regexp(2) suitable?

For something that simple, you might as well just hand write it,
particularly if you're going to have to support somethig typedef-like.