From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 19:26:35 -0400 From: Kris Maglione To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] bell-labs website and plan9 Message-ID: <20070409232635.GA3187@kris.home> References: <7d3530220704051415k79bab7efg97b140b77f4fdfba@mail.gmail.com> <9ab217670704090750h19fd808dw171a046d088df5f@mail.gmail.com> <13426df10704090822n2f4fe2mf26cc042e9de7de0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <13426df10704090822n2f4fe2mf26cc042e9de7de0@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 42b7bf7a-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:22:27AM -0700, ron minnich wrote: >My take is that bringing in mercurial, and then using mercurial with >mounted file systems, instead of ssh, would be quite neat. And, we are >close to having it. I'd think that it would be practically a no-op, but I'm not sure of hg's=20 locking semantics. I'd say that it would be a very good idea to support=20 cpu and ssh, though, since ssh uses a separate protocol which should be=20 significantly faster than just doing the work over 9P. Again, I'm not=20 sure of the details. --=20 Kris Maglione There's no time like the present for postponing what you don't want to do. --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGGsurseQZD8Aui4wRAvt8AJ94YSipXxUOSrz105Mhbw8rDZykAACfWUNN U34f/jM6oMQfD5WMlBi/1NA= =6XFq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--