From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon,  9 Apr 2007 21:08:36 -0400
From: Kris Maglione <bsdaemon@comcast.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] bell-labs website and plan9
Message-ID: <20070410010836.GB3187@kris.home>
References: <20070409232635.GA3187@kris.home>
	<5efb0db6fba0c2dc536240f5d82185ef@coraid.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5efb0db6fba0c2dc536240f5d82185ef@coraid.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 42ecac58-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:15:56PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
>i don't understand why ssh "using a seperate protocol" implies that it sho=
uld
>be significantly faster than 9p.  could you explain why you think this?

I don't know the specifics, but I do know that there is a protocol used=20
for HTTP and SSH which are designed to speed up operations on the=20
repository. I think it relates to the fact that parsing the FS would=20
require many synchronous round-trips which would be faster locally. I=20
believe that the paper elaborates.

--=20
Kris Maglione

When you need to knock on wood is when you realize the
world's composed of aluminum and vinyl.

--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGGuOUseQZD8Aui4wRAjhdAJ0YlIxtnUpmrF9gTkuskT88QUWSugCcDKuX
D9dPTTzAPTYqSyM7oXwRWUI=
=lXXK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0--