From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:49:02 -0400
From: Kris Maglione <bsdaemon@comcast.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] equivalent of fstat | grep $portnumber ?
Message-ID: <20070619164902.GB67517@kris.home>
References: <20070619152735.GB6960@pestilenz.org>
	<b8236d78be4464c22952d151831a5759@9netics.com>
	<20070619161347.GA67517@kris.home>
	<14ec7b180706190917j3d1f2edbt68ef2c8d5df9f8cc@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <14ec7b180706190917j3d1f2edbt68ef2c8d5df9f8cc@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 81768cb4-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:17:17AM -0600, andrey mirtchovski wrote:
> i just found a small program i had forgotten about that mimics unix'
> lsof. it's in /contrib/andrey/cmd/lsof.c

I don't really see the point. It seems only marginally easier, if at=20
all, than grepping /proc/*/fd. Most of the time, I think you'd want to=20
grap the output, anyway, in which case, it's easier to just grep /proc.=20
But, assuming it's useful, why write it in C when you may as well write=20
it in rc?

#!/bin/rc

if(~ $#* 0)
	* =3D `{cd /proc; echo *}

grep '.?' /proc/^$*^/fd | sed 's,^/proc/([0-9]+)/fd:,\1	,'

--=20
Kris Maglione

You can't fix it if it ain't broke.

--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGeAj9seQZD8Aui4wRAg38AJoDtT970bPPnjpkYrh0/Erqn1+7qwCgl5zt
8UZpX/kPCYyytSIhVFLXVuU=
=IgNW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu--