From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:48:24 +0200 From: Enrico Weigelt To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] 9P vs. FUSE Message-ID: <20070810124824.GH18939@nibiru.local> References: <20070810123336.GG18939@nibiru.local> <22bce9d3afa44ed70b739ea77d5d8046@quanstro.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <22bce9d3afa44ed70b739ea77d5d8046@quanstro.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Topicbox-Message-UUID: a3fd1ce4-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 * erik quanstrom wrote: > > BTW: I'm still interested in functional differences between > > FUSE and 9P. For example, does 9P support all *nix style > > inode types (ie. symlinks, devices, pipes, etc) ? > > there are no inodes in 9p. so no. Some file attributes, which can tell an special file type ? cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------