From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] secstore and PAKserver
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@swtch.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:19:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <96cb5a995b85bf656a8ddf7ef4356336@proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20070828221926.4D1BA1E8C35@holo.morphisms.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b1455c04-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I want to leverage the functionality of the secstore for a different
> application (I'm not yet ready to publicize the details, but I will to
> anyone who shows some interest), but this seems to put a bit of a
> spanner in the works.  Naturally, I can prototype with it, but in the
> long term I have either to licence the PAK stuff (who do I contact?)
> or to replace the code with an analogous facility.
> 
> Has the licence been waved for p9p?  What are the terms of the
> licence?  Does anyone know of licence free options to perform a
> similar function?  I suppose I ought to ask what is so special about
> PAK, too or, more to the point, what does it do that made Bell Labs
> choose it for the secstore?  Maybe if I understood PAK better I'd be
> able to decide whether it is as important in my application as it was
> for the secstore.

I am not a lawyer; this is not legal advice.

The Lucent Public License permits redistribution of the programs
contained in the Plan 9 distribution, secstore included, in source
or binary forms, and includes appropriate copyright and patent
licenses.  I believe that is the only license needed for me to 
distribute the p9p programs.  I have no special arrangement
with Lucent.

The details are in /LICENSE.

Of course, in such licensing situations, I have never understood
where the line is between redistributing the entire Plan 9 software
(obviously permitted, with copyright and patent licenses granted)
and redistributing just a few snippets of Plan 9 code that make up
an insignificant part of a larger program that happens to use 
techniques from those same patents.  I'm fairly certain p9p is on
the first side of that line, but I still don't know where the line is.

If this really matters to you, you should talk to a lawyer.

If you're not using Plan 9 code, you might look at SRP.
I don't think the licensing issues are any less murky than PAK,
but they are at least more widely studied.

Russ