From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed,  5 Sep 2007 22:42:06 -0400
From: William Josephson <jkw@eecs.harvard.edu>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] secstore and PAKserver
Message-ID: <20070906024206.GA85286@mero.morphisms.net>
References: <96cb5a995b85bf656a8ddf7ef4356336@proxima.alt.za>
	<20070828221926.4D1BA1E8C35@holo.morphisms.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070828221926.4D1BA1E8C35@holo.morphisms.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b8cf8dfa-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 06:19:24PM -0400, Russ Cox wrote:
> If you're not using Plan 9 code, you might look at SRP.
> I don't think the licensing issues are any less murky than PAK,
> but they are at least more widely studied.

There ought to be an SRP implementation for secstore
lying around somewhere, possibly at the Labs.  I did
one the summer the USENIX security paper got written.