From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu,  1 Nov 2007 12:46:54 +0100
From: Christian Kellermann <Christian.Kellermann@nefkom.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <20071101114654.GG7416@hermes.my.domain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8bBEDOJVaa9YlTAt"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
Subject: [9fans] Rio piemenu patch in sorry/
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e2b5e77c-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


--8bBEDOJVaa9YlTAt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear List,

I noticed that the rio piemenu patch is located in /n/patch/sorry
despite its note. If there is a reason one should not apply this
patch, then I think it does not make sense to keep the other piemenu
patches in saved as they rely on this one.

Kind regards,

Christian

--=20
You may use my gpg key for replies:
pub  1024D/47F79788 2005/02/02 Christian Kellermann (C-Keen)

--8bBEDOJVaa9YlTAt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (OpenBSD)

iD8DBQFHKbyuXYob3Uf3l4gRAo1FAJ4vS/3xfjl3pbNdlnS5V5knq6LyrgCgpiZW
IIFGhj0qRuhhWJ4nB+3Nfxc=
=Ks51
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--8bBEDOJVaa9YlTAt--