From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:32:36 -0500
From: William Josephson <jkw@eecs.harvard.edu>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Ruby port
Message-ID: <20071112233236.GA36132@mero.morphisms.net>
References: <13426df10711121101p7f1677a2qcd4dc4f18222117d@mail.gmail.com>
	<d99f5e1ac63934b6ac74f4a2c680369f@quintile.net>
	<218917ef0711121339l65f11a7fx69ca20fe5fc44824@mail.gmail.com>
	<AF4B514A-B9BB-4322-9AF8-4290AED0D909@mac.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AF4B514A-B9BB-4322-9AF8-4290AED0D909@mac.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f4637aca-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:39:17PM -0500, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:
> Who uses Fortran 90? I haven't seen any F90 compiler in wide use; the  
> FSF is still working with F77.

Actually, a lot of scientists seem to use Fortran 90.
Current versions of gfortran support (most of?) Fortran 95.