From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:01:34 +0100 From: Enrico Weigelt To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Nine4Linux [WAS: Glendix?] Message-ID: <20071122180134.GD13964@nibiru.local> References: <20071116084254.GD17281@nibiru.local> <1b69251dfdcb6b8022ff78767f07ce86@quanstro.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1b69251dfdcb6b8022ff78767f07ce86@quanstro.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Topicbox-Message-UUID: 08f2174e-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 * erik quanstrom wrote: > have you seen p9p (http://swtch.com/plan9port)? Yes, but I'm not yet sure if this is really what I have in mind. But at least its a good step in that direction. I'm intending to trim down uclibc and maybe put the p9p base library stuff (9P handling, etc) there. This should save us the glibc overhead. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------