From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:26:54 +0100
From: Christian Kellermann <Christian.Kellermann@nefkom.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] imap4d and upas/fs
Message-ID: <20071215162654.GJ30763@hermes.my.domain>
References: <82c890d00712150159kd57b31es2693b10af9272e4f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vk/v8fjDPiDepTtA"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <82c890d00712150159kd57b31es2693b10af9272e4f@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 19e2bc7a-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


--vk/v8fjDPiDepTtA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Gabriel Diaz <gabidiaz@gmail.com> [071215 11:05]:
> Hello
>=20
> is there any way of serving imaps without running upas/fs for each
> mail box accessed on the server?
>=20
> i'm running out of memory.
>=20
> I saw that upas/fs is called from auth.c of imap4d with -np so, i
> suppose it ill not use much memory (if i call it by hand it eats
> 268K), but when imap4d execs it, i can't see any command line options
> for fs with ps -a, but i can see high memory usage (depending on the
> box i open).
>=20
> is upas/fs executed from other places i don't see? is anyone seeing
> this or i missconfigured something?

Russ has rewritten p9p's upas/fs to address this problem. p9's
upas/fs could be patched accordingly IIRC. Russ will know more...

Regards,

Christian

--=20
You may use my gpg key for replies:
pub  1024D/47F79788 2005/02/02 Christian Kellermann (C-Keen)

--vk/v8fjDPiDepTtA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (OpenBSD)

iD8DBQFHZABOXYob3Uf3l4gRAiMRAJ9VnmguvD2iHFzoaj+fKoMTYo/PgwCfRf63
8FwEHR2U7CeWE5fORy1Rqb0=
=zvEL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vk/v8fjDPiDepTtA--