From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:31:49 +0100 From: Enrico Weigelt To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] OLE vs. 9P Message-ID: <20080108183148.GB10899@nibiru.local> References: <20080107184458.GB30950@nibiru.local> <1199736892.4308.311.camel@work.sfbay.sun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1199736892.4308.311.camel@work.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Topicbox-Message-UUID: 28c35c90-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 * Roman Shaposhnik wrote: Hi, > OLE is heavily abused term. And example you gave with browser > plugins helps, but I'll be easier to answer you question if > you can be more specific. Okay, then let's stay at browser plugins. I really want to get them out to their own processes and speaking 9P (nspluginwrapper is already going in that direction, but not yet far enough) We could start with an remote display/framebuffer (a little bit like an tiny X via 9P ;-o) cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------