From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:57:04 +0100
From: Martin Neubauer <m.ne@gmx.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] How to move to rc from sh/bash
Message-ID: <20080212115704.GA851@shodan.homeunix.net>
References: <b954b2060802082353h694ee9a3kd008351835d9f27a@mail.gmail.com>
	<599f06db0802100859l2a13a8e7o9d6a492138d44421@mail.gmail.com>
	<41F23396-1019-4C8E-A65A-E42824B0E23B@mac.com>
	<20080210181244.GA801@shodan.homeunix.net>
	<5d375e920802111559kb5557d2k182a810ad4c11123@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5d375e920802111559kb5557d2k182a810ad4c11123@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 50acec62-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

* Uriel (uriel99@gmail.com) wrote:
> It is more likely that the information you want is not even in the man
> page, gnu man pages are severely crippled, and if you want the real
> documentation you have to travel to info hell which is likely to
> contain ten times as much (mis)information and be ten times harder to
> browse.
>
> And there you have the greatest innovation GNU has ever brought to
> unix, in gnu systems I rarely even bother checking the docs, because
> even random trial and error usually takes much less effort than
> navigating the fetid info swamp.
>
> uriel

Damn, I was just going to ignore that mess.