From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:25:11 -0700 From: David Morris To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9port build failure on Linux (debian) Message-ID: <20080303162511.GC28226@morris-clan.net> References: <20080303042017.GE14610@morris-clan.net> <20080303084557.GA24732@morris-clan.net> <20080303084639.GB24732@morris-clan.net> <140e7ec30803030709g23c81b57jab711b7eaf121a04@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <140e7ec30803030709g23c81b57jab711b7eaf121a04@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6d87ddb0-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:09:27AM +0900, sqweek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 5:46 PM, David Morris wrote: > > This time the build worked, so looks like some lenny/sid > > packages don't work well together. Hmm, or another > > possibility occurs to me. I use the AMD64 kernel > > (2.6.22-3-amd64) on my desktop, but i686 on the laptop > > (2.6.22-3-i686). Any chance that could cause a problem? > > I run p9p on x86_64 at work (CentOS), so no. There are some problems > with 9pfuse under x86_64 (which look like fuse's fault to me), but the > only problem I had at build was missing dependencies (some X11 > development packages). > I'll try and remember to cvs update and see if it still builds. Good to know. I was thinking more along the lines of a problem because I'm using a 64-bit kernel in a 32-bit userspace, a setup I've had other applications have problems with, though it was a binary distribution I simply had to recompile. --David