From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:04:23 PDT."
	<13426df10804161204v5a33f59ala896838bb10f16a0@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bakul Shah <bakul+plan9@bitblocks.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:48:04 -0700
Message-Id: <20080416194804.E3B735B54@mail.bitblocks.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] telnet vs. godaddy whois
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8f092bec-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:04:23 PDT "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>  wrote:
> This is really an interesting discussion -- anybody think it could go
> on the wiki? I enjoyed it anyway :-)
>
> A good example of how correct behaviour (in this case Plan 9) can get
> you spanked.

Er... "correct" seems a bit strong. Why is Plan9 sending one
byte of data when it knows the receiver's window is closed?

Here is part of the plan9 trace Russ posted:
    002418 ms
        ether(s=0007b3f12c00 d=0004238ecb1a pr=0800 ln=64)
        ip(s=68.178.211.43 d=18.26.4.98 id=9330 frag=0000 ttl=223 pr=6 ln=40)
        tcp(s=43 d=32619 seq=2734158449 ack=1578393268 fl=AS win=0 ck=afb0)
    002437 ms
        ether(s=0004238ecb1a d=0007b3f12c00 pr=0800 ln=60)
        ip(s=18.26.4.98 d=68.178.211.43 id=9339 frag=0000 ttl=255 pr=6 ln=40)
        tcp(s=32619 d=43 seq=1578393268 ack=2734158450 fl=AP win=65535 ck=afa9)
    002456 ms
        ether(s=0004238ecb1a d=0007b3f12c00 pr=0800 ln=60)
        ip(s=18.26.4.98 d=68.178.211.43 id=933a frag=0000 ttl=255 pr=6 ln=41)
        tcp(s=32619 d=43 seq=1578393268 ack=2734158450 fl=A win=65535 ck=48b0)
        dump(g)

See RFC793, page 4, last para:
    TCP provides a means for the receiver to govern the amount of data
    sent by the sender.  This is achieved by returning a "window" with
    every ACK indicating a range of acceptable sequence numbers beyond
    the last segment successfully received.  The window indicates an
    allowed number of octets that the sender may transmit before
    receiving further permission.