From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:53:05 +0200 From: Enrico Weigelt To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20080611175304.GA23490@nibiru.local> References: <20080611124038.GA3004@nibiru.local> <20080611132853.E4B821E8C1F@holo.morphisms.net> <20080611153020.GE402@nibiru.local> <5d375e920806110843w3267df9anebe733e4231b6893@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5d375e920806110843w3267df9anebe733e4231b6893@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: [9fans] Modularizing plan9port Topicbox-Message-UUID: bad8ebae-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 * Uriel wrote: Hi, > If you want to cross-compile why don't you use Plan 9? I'm not using (native) Plan9 - just a few tools from p9p. For my targets I need to integrate them into Gnu'ish platforms. So, an p9p-compile'd app has to run just like any other app, w/o additionally porting. > Cross-compiling in Gnu/land is a nightmare not worth going into. No, it isn't - as long as you've got a proper toolchain and get around autoshit. (eg. I've got my own libtool implementation ;-p) cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ cellphone: +49 174 7066481 email: info@metux.de skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ----------------------------------------------------------------------