From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@9fans.net Subject: Re: [9fans] P9p's mount(1) on linux From: "Russ Cox" Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:59:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <140e7ec30806191408t66d61414hffe8870b34e24bcf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20080619225747.D3DDE1E8C1F@holo.morphisms.net> Topicbox-Message-UUID: c3a1c314-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Speaking of 9pfuse - I've just pulled and the version distributed > with p9p is still not going to work on linux/x86_64. I posted a patch > for this[1], though 9fans.net doesn't appear to archive attachments - > see http://sqweek.dnsdojo.org/tmp/9pfuse.LARGEFILE.diff Done. > Also, I've sent you a couple of emails off-list recently about a bug > in 9p(1). I can't think of anything I might have done to offend you, > so I'm assuming they've been marked as spam or otherwise waylaid - > should I just post the patch to 9fans? > If you did get the patch and have just been thinking about it, then > my apologies for being impatient. That scenario just seems > increasingly unlikely :) Done. The patch you sent had to do with Unix signals, so I had been putting off having to think about it. Russ