From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:24:05 +0200
From: Martin Neubauer <m.ne@gmx.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20080711152405.GA1459@shodan.homeunix.net>
References: <91ca1c8d0807100832h51a5916fs98786765429d3896@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080710165101.GA1065@shodan.homeunix.net>
	<91ca1c8d0807110758q218febafx6054534011c44d3e@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <91ca1c8d0807110758q218febafx6054534011c44d3e@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Subject: Re: [9fans] vx32 @ FreeBSD: 9vx/a/chan.c:1220: error: conflicting
	types for 'memrchr'
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e3800d26-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Speaking of FreeBSD, I'd guess that all versions up to 7.0-RELEASE (and some
time beyond) don't have it. As the surrounding code seems to be more or less
shared with drawterm and inferno that could make for a large share of the
user base (on FreeBSD.) Therefore I think the rename would be the cleanest
solution. In some way that reminds me of the situation described in ``#ifdef
considered harmful.''

* Nikolai Saoukh (nms+9fans@otdel-1.org) wrote:
> This function is used exactly one time in the same file (~30 lines
> below). What kind (version) of OS does not have memrchr?