From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:48:59 +0200
From: Martin Neubauer <m.ne@gmx.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20080715114859.GA1006@shodan.homeunix.net>
References: <10b109140807150428n69f4bff5rd99cacb5224d9099@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <10b109140807150428n69f4bff5rd99cacb5224d9099@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Subject: Re: [9fans] fshalt - 2xdone
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e7161458-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I'm pretty sure the line 7 isn't part of the halting procedure. It just
indicates that it's time for fossil to do a new snapshot which isn't
possible because the file system is halted. So just believe fshalt when it
claims it is done.

* Antonin Vecera (antonin.vecera@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to ask a question: when I am doing "fshalt" I got this screen:
>
> 1. server# fshalt
> 2. syncing.../srv/fscons...prompt: venti...
> 3. halting.../srv/fscons...archive vac:03f1ac6d50d1d191405b33e7f6
> 4. srv -AWP replica
> 5. prompt:
> 6. done halting
> 7. fsSnapshot snap: file system is halted
>
> "fshalt" sometimes stops at line 6 and sometimes (after a minute)
> appends line 7.
>
> question: When I halt plan9 should I wait for the message from line 7
> and then power off ?
>               If not, can I make filesystem damaged?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Antonin