9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathaniel W Filardo <nwf@cs.jhu.edu>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: [9fans] Multi-domain authentication?
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:38:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081020043817.GG4216@masters10.cs.jhu.edu> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1067 bytes --]

Hullo list.

http://osdir.com/ml/os.plan9.nine-grid/2005-06/msg00001.html is a proposal
from some years ago from TIP9UG to do multi-domain authentication in a way
somewhat reminiscent of Kerberos.[1]

The only change to factotum, AFAICT, was the following addition:
>    if(_strfindattr(s->key->attr, "grid")){
>      snprint(s->t.suid, sizeof s->t.suid, "%s@%s", s->t.cuid, _strfindattr(s->key->attr, "dom"));
>      safecpy(s->t.cuid, s->t.suid, sizeof s->t.cuid);
>      flog("grid user: %s", s->t.suid);
>    }
in the SHaveAuth case of p9skread.

This seems like a good way to go about MDA, so I am curious why this change
didn't get put back into the mainline code?  Is there something
fundamentally wrong?  Was a different approach selected?  Was the issue
simply tabled?

Thanks.
--nwf;

[1] I say similar to Kerberos in that it requires a domain A wishing to
accept identities from domain B to have a key from B's authsrv.  It differs
from Kerberos in that users in domain B act as if B's authsrv was the
authenticator for domain A.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 204 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2008-10-20  4:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-20  4:38 Nathaniel W Filardo [this message]
2008-10-20 23:43 erik quanstrom
2008-10-21  0:09 ` andrey mirtchovski
2008-10-21  0:10   ` erik quanstrom
2008-10-21  0:40     ` andrey mirtchovski
2008-10-21  2:21 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2008-10-21  0:49 erik quanstrom
2008-10-21  1:05 ` andrey mirtchovski
2008-10-21  2:25   ` ron minnich
2008-10-21  3:29 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-10-21  7:25   ` roger peppe
2008-10-21  7:52   ` Steve Simon
2008-10-21 17:43   ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2008-10-21 13:14 erik quanstrom
2008-10-21 17:45 erik quanstrom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081020043817.GG4216@masters10.cs.jhu.edu \
    --to=nwf@cs.jhu.edu \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).