From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 00:36:09 +0100 From: Mechiel Lukkien To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <20081108233608.GA13833@knaagkever.ueber.net> References: <8ccc8ba40811080411h4a47a1x41178094552578c2@mail.gmail.com> <4f34febc0811081115i2a41eb9ew8d99030cfcc8bdf@mail.gmail.com> <859C5745-8864-4740-84CF-878A365067AA@sun.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <859C5745-8864-4740-84CF-878A365067AA@sun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: [9fans] Do we have a catalog of 9P servers? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 36d2a812-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 02:16:39PM -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Nov 8, 2008, at 11:15 AM, John Barham wrote: > >>>It seems that MS is pushing webdav hard. > >> > >>that's what's needed when heavy things run out of fuel. > > > >Even as a potential substitute for ftp webdav is a farce. Speaking > >from personal experience, the amount of XML you need to generate for a > >directory listing is at least 20 times the size of the equivalent ftp > >listing, and then you twiddle your thumbs waiting for the webdav > >client to parse and render it. it's not that bad! # readdir in xml... PROPREQ = array of byte ""; > > But think about this: why would you care if you have this: > http://noedler.de/projekte/wdfs/ > > Why would anyone care about what's getting pushed to the > wire? i guess it's just us who care, since we have to implement the protocols if we want to use them. for this case, i'm not sure what didn't stop me: http://www.ueber.net/code/r/webdavfs unpolished as always, but i've used it to edit files from my homedir at my isp. mechiel