From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:25:11 -0500
From: Nathaniel W Filardo <nwf@cs.jhu.edu>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20081216192511.GT9593@masters10.cs.jhu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rPPpwUGuQquO0YR9"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject: [9fans] Multiple '#s' ?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 631fdc96-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


--rPPpwUGuQquO0YR9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Is it crazy to propose that the kernel should offer multiple devsrv sources?
It seems to me that it might be a useful to isolate proesses from things
that have been posted in /srv's even if they run as the same user under,
without preventing the use of /srv altogether.

If something like this is possible, how?  If not, has there just not been
demand?  Or is there some active problem with the idea of multiple named
pipe namespaces on one kernel?

Thanks much.
--nwf;

--rPPpwUGuQquO0YR9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAklIAJYACgkQTeQabvr9Tc+AbgCfW9JN/q6AuoAijzYKinixnewg
US0An1SGHi2bF23QhdhCtD8SFfpj9QKB
=6TuH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rPPpwUGuQquO0YR9--