From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:39:15 -0500
From: Nathaniel W Filardo <nwf@cs.jhu.edu>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20090126023915.GW3413@masters6.cs.jhu.edu>
References: <7B8C87F2-DB31-4B60-A7E8-E7B51F42B888%jp@hapra.at>
	<a4e6962a0901250649l60ef5270md0b34cea039496b0@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="69FgzCUgmxT1EUzs"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a4e6962a0901250649l60ef5270md0b34cea039496b0@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject: Re: [9fans] p9 file server (npfs) w/ authentication
	from	heterogenous systems
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 86ab2238-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


--69FgzCUgmxT1EUzs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 08:49:57AM -0600, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> For servers there are lots of choices, but spfs/npfs are the only ones
> (I know of) which support the UNIX extensions (for things like UID
> mapping, etc.)

A quick look at npfs and spfs suggests that neither support p9sk1 auth?  Am
I misreading?

Thanks.
--nwf;

--69FgzCUgmxT1EUzs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkl9IlMACgkQTeQabvr9Tc8PBACaA8u++dwnL9V6jvWio/VcXfZU
r8oAnjdVpeAnO+3yWcSPvacHb42NWPDv
=q2iC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--69FgzCUgmxT1EUzs--