From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:13:03 -0500 From: Nathaniel W Filardo To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20090210221303.GN22259@masters6.cs.jhu.edu> References: <1234302707.4957.127.camel@goose.sun.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NJSRbAqOy4NeGDns" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1234302707.4957.127.camel@goose.sun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Subject: Re: [9fans] source browsing via http is back Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9d6ea5da-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --NJSRbAqOy4NeGDns Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:51:47PM -0800, Roman V. Shaposhnik wrote: > since replica requires some (albeit automatic) periodic work on the > server end it means that there's one more thing for bell lab folks > to care about and maintain. that said, a brand new Venti proxy or > what not will probably be even worse for them :-( Under the proposed scheme, clients and maybe mirrors, not sources, run the new proxy. Sources runs only a venti and venti/ro, unmodified, to allow clients and mirrors to fetch blocks, and auth/none vac. Is this unreasonable? --nwf; --NJSRbAqOy4NeGDns Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmR++8ACgkQTeQabvr9Tc+7ZwCfce4qB48RswtOp/NAPyHDdJAi 7G8An1PpQQC9gDbaK3ivPZPMvEGp6EKq =MhhN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NJSRbAqOy4NeGDns--