From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Mar 2009 10:47:20 PST."
	<1236365240.16176.2826.camel@work>
References: <138575260903030352s623807d7p5a3075b1f7a591f6@mail.gmail.com>
	<3e1162e60903030719v141b41e9ma5fd98c73d8b0e7c@mail.gmail.com>
	<1236103870.4929.101.camel@goose.sun.com>
	<20090303183836.2DE505B2E@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<1236365240.16176.2826.camel@work>
From: Bakul Shah <bakul+plan9@bitblocks.com>
Date: Fri,  6 Mar 2009 16:21:20 -0800
Message-Id: <20090307002121.182415B21@mail.bitblocks.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] threads vs forks
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b52488b6-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 10:47:20 PST Roman V Shaposhnik <rvs@sun.com>  wrote:
> Clojure is definitely something that I would like to play
> with extensively. Looks very promising from the outset,
> so the only question that I have is how does it feel
> when used for substantial things.

You can browse various Clojure related google groups but
there is only one way to find out if it is for you!

> P.S. My belief in it was actually reaffirmed by a raving
> endorsement it got from an old LISP community. Those
> guys are a bit like 9fans, if you know what I mean ;-)

No comment :-)