From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:40:46 -0400 From: Nathaniel W Filardo To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20090328184046.GH22497@masters6.cs.jhu.edu> References: <20090328162750.GG22497@masters6.cs.jhu.edu> <7074eaeba3db257fbc8ddf9c9d169cae@quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9gXqgVhKaPB5h51M" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7074eaeba3db257fbc8ddf9c9d169cae@quanstro.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil caching venti errors Topicbox-Message-UUID: cbb89fa4-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --9gXqgVhKaPB5h51M Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 01:31:01PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote: > it would be interesting to know if the score > of the block returned by venti/read is correct. venti/read should be doing this check automatically since libventi/client.c builds with "int ventidoublechecksha1 = 1;" by default. --nwf; --9gXqgVhKaPB5h51M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknOby4ACgkQTeQabvr9Tc/94ACffookltia/rWlaeMUZF50rmgE cPQAnj8Swc8R7QF0A0HbxyzqRHIZEaaw =CK6m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9gXqgVhKaPB5h51M--