From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tlaronde@polynum.com Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:43:57 +0200 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20090417194357.GB3103@polynum.com> References: <57928816a76e769327ca134d7e28bd06@bellsouth.net> <404df7e5d05c5ae6057ea214164f0d0d@quintile.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <404df7e5d05c5ae6057ea214164f0d0d@quintile.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 - the next 20 years Topicbox-Message-UUID: e2ea4844-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 08:16:40PM +0100, Steve Simon wrote: > I cannot find the reference (sorry), but I read an interview with Ken > (Thompson) a while ago. > > He was asked what he would change if he where working on plan9 now, > and his reply was somthing like "I would add support for cloud computing". > > I admin I am not clear exactly what he meant by this. My interpretation of cloud computing is precisely the split done by plan9 with terminal/CPU/FileServer: a UI runing on a this Terminal, with actual computing done somewhere about data stored somewhere. Perhaps tools for migrating tasks or managing the thing. But I have the impression that the Plan 9 framework is the best for such a scheme. -- Thierry Laronde (Alceste) http://www.kergis.com/ Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C