From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:33:16 +0100 From: Ethan Grammatikidis To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-Id: <20090706213316.9f19eb75.eekee57@fastmail.fm> In-Reply-To: <8ea8ac62ad614c50271f5b328b4a9346@gmx.de> References: <20090706185922.5d5f8ffa.eekee57@fastmail.fm> <8ea8ac62ad614c50271f5b328b4a9346@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Guide to using Acme effectively? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 144fd264-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:57:19 +0200 cinap_lenrek@gmx.de wrote: > yeah... connecting terminals to warp energy plasma conduits > seems to be a bad idea. Yeah, it's also a deeply wierd thing to do unless the terminals require at least several megawatts. O.o Each... I can't think of any reason for that. The displays may be print-quality (2000dpi) and the touch layer supposedly able to read fingerprints, but that's not far beyond current tech. Superluminal signalling signalling seems not to require much power as the tiny com badges feature delay-free communication at least as far as lunar orbit. Yes I've done this before. :) How far off topic are we now? Can we get away with carrying on? :) -- Ethan Grammatikidis Those who are slower at parsing information must necessarily be faster at problem-solving.