From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:30:13 +0100
From: Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57@fastmail.fm>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-Id: <20090811113013.8513221d.eekee57@fastmail.fm>
In-Reply-To: <4A808A92.1000800@orcasystems.com>
References: <4A7F246E.8000504@tecmav.com>
	<4A808A92.1000800@orcasystems.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Unexpected 8c warning message
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 41782048-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:01:06 -0700
James Tomaschke <james@orcasystems.com> wrote:

> What about,
>
> i = 0;
> do {
> 	SD = SDList[i++];
> 	...
> } while(i<2);
>

I was about to suggest something similar. I'm actually trying to avoid
using for(;;) altogether which may seem odd to some but I just don't like
parsing a for statement, it's rarely clear and usually ugly to my eyes. I
still often forget to increment the counter, but that error produces
a very obvious symptom. When I don't forget I place the increment on a
line by itself, the last of the block, for clarity.


--
Ethan Grammatikidis

Those who are slower at parsing information must
necessarily be faster at problem-solving.