From: John Stalker <stalker@maths.tcd.ie>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] mishandling empty lists - let's fix it
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 22:04:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200910052204.aa92451@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091005192428.GA24445@nipl.net>
I think that you're right to complain, but that you aren't quite
complaining about the right thing and are therefore offering the
wrong solution. The problem is utilities which take list arguments,
but which treat empty lists differently. Shell globbing rules can
make this better or worse, depending on context, but the problem
is in the semantics of our favourite utilities. In a consistent
world
`cat' would concatenate 0 files, i.e. ouptut nothing,
`chmod 755' would set the permissions of no files to 755,
`cp foo/' would move no files to the directory foo,
`df' would show free disk space for no filesystems,
`kill' would stop no processes,
`ln foo/' would hardlink no files into the directory foo,
`ls' would list no files (you would use `ls .' for the usual case),
`mkdir' would create no directories,
`mv foo/' would move no files into the directory foo,
`ps -U' would show no users' processes,
`rm' would remove no files,
and `sh' would execute no scripts in the Bourne shell.
None of these would produce errors. These are UNIX examples, but
Plan 9 is not much different in this regard. A quick glance shows
that somewhere between a third and a half of all the basic utilities
have this property. Nothing you do to the shell will change this
much. A quick look through shell scripts I've written recently
convinces me that almost all of them would break if the basic
utilities were modified to treat empty lists consistently, even
though only one uses file name globbing in any way.
If you really want to fix the problem then the sensible thing
to do would be to write new versions of many utilities, with new
names, and then write a shell without globbing. For new scripts
you would use the new utilities and shell and leave everything
else as it is. Is it worth the effort? That's a question which
can only be answered by the person who would be doing the work.
--
John Stalker
School of Mathematics
Trinity College Dublin
tel +353 1 896 1983
fax +353 1 896 2282
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-05 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <<20091005055423.GA14691@nipl.net>
2009-10-05 13:30 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-05 16:13 ` Russ Cox
2009-10-05 19:24 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-05 19:31 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-05 21:04 ` John Stalker [this message]
2009-10-05 22:13 ` Jason Catena
2009-10-06 10:10 ` lucio
2009-10-06 2:22 ` ron minnich
2009-10-06 4:37 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-06 4:50 ` ron minnich
2009-10-06 6:40 ` John Stalker
2009-10-06 17:45 ` Brian L. Stuart
2009-10-06 18:00 ` John Stalker
2009-10-06 18:27 ` ron minnich
2009-10-07 8:30 ` John Stalker
2009-10-07 11:05 ` roger peppe
2009-10-06 8:40 ` matt
2009-10-06 16:50 ` John Stalker
2009-10-06 17:15 ` Jason Catena
2009-10-06 17:50 ` Tim Newsham
2009-10-06 19:27 ` John Stalker
2009-10-06 20:10 ` Jason Catena
2009-10-05 21:35 ` Russ Cox
[not found] <<200910071414.aa02318@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
2009-10-07 13:36 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-07 14:02 ` W B Hacker
[not found] <<200910070930.aa64725@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
2009-10-07 12:14 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-07 13:14 ` John Stalker
[not found] <<200910060740.aa94573@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
2009-10-06 12:59 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] <<646955677faa922172207300b93ff6ea@hamnavoe.com>
2009-10-04 18:39 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-03 16:03 Sam Watkins
2009-10-03 17:01 ` Rob Pike
2009-10-03 18:31 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-03 18:56 ` Rob Pike
2009-10-03 19:05 ` blstuart
2009-10-03 19:18 ` hiro
2009-10-03 20:31 ` Steve Simon
2009-10-05 16:08 ` John Stalker
2009-10-05 16:24 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-05 17:20 ` John Stalker
2009-10-05 19:09 ` roger peppe
2009-10-03 18:46 ` Bakul Shah
2009-10-03 19:11 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-04 4:12 ` lucio
2009-10-04 7:17 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-04 9:18 ` lucio
2009-10-05 6:20 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-05 6:53 ` Federico G. Benavento
2009-10-04 10:46 ` Richard Miller
2009-10-06 6:59 ` Uriel
2009-10-06 12:01 ` Jacob Todd
2009-10-04 10:59 ` sqweek
2009-10-05 5:54 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-05 11:23 ` matt
2009-10-04 10:18 ` Charles Forsyth
2009-10-04 10:26 ` lucio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200910052204.aa92451@salmon.maths.tcd.ie \
--to=stalker@maths.tcd.ie \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).