From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:08:23 +1100
From: Sam Watkins <sam@nipl.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <20091028190823.GA2378@nipl.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Subject: [9fans] parallel systems
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 92e890c0-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I think my main points were good.

  * can parallelize by duplicating subsystems / divide and conquer
  * can parallelize by pipelining, even down to the arithmetic level
  * latency is limited by Ahmdal's law, potential throughput should not be
  * multi-tasking can potentially use close to the full power of a system

A factory is a parallel system.  A car factory can come close to fully
utilizing thousands of human and robot workers.

I think well-designed parallel systems can efficiently solve many laborious
computing problems.  Invocations of Ahmdal have not convinced me otherwise.

Sam