From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:27:14 +0100
From: Martin Neubauer <m.ne@gmx.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20091030162714.GB1025@shodan.homeunix.net>
References: <a560a5d00910300820s126ccc40y56c5de7a5b64e94f@mail.gmail.com>
	<a560a5d00910300844i7c9b9ccdxaa566cf56728dca6@mail.gmail.com>
	<3aaafc130910300855l3d7113a2hd3fcf3c4330930c1@mail.gmail.com>
	<a560a5d00910300909ncafcb7drb76f9a0922f3a77a@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a560a5d00910300909ncafcb7drb76f9a0922f3a77a@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Subject: Re: [9fans] hoc's behaviour, unary operators
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 94a483ce-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

* Rudolf Sykora (rudolf.sykora@gmail.com) wrote:
> (a-- b wouldn't make sense) it probably can't (can it?) be parsed
> simply with yacc...
I don't see why it would be impossible. Just introduce a binary --
operator (cf. -1 vs. 1-2). Whether it's worth it...