From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Sat,  9 Jan 2010 08:33:13 +0300
From: anonymous <aim0shei@lavabit.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <20100109053313.GA19304@machine>
References: <20100108094014.GA16595@machine>
	<28ff9005991e4d1456712876624cc583@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <28ff9005991e4d1456712876624cc583@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [9fans] libthread API
Topicbox-Message-UUID: bb3f2dd6-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Thanks, now I understand. The main question was why threadcreate asks
for function pointer and can't just leave me in my function like rfork.
So it is because we should move local variables out of scope as they
are no more valid cause we have a new completely clear stack.

But when it is better to use rfork with shared memory and when
libthread?