From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:20:51 +0000
From: Jacob Todd <jaketodd422@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20100212082051.GA29445@zoidberg.hsd1.mi.comcast.net>
References: <f75780241002101054k79b43328le084dcbd93da903c@mail.gmail.com>
	<b5d0bd9c-da9e-4767-86d8-6a1fc0fbffb2@f8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b5d0bd9c-da9e-4767-86d8-6a1fc0fbffb2@f8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [9fans] Speed of 9pfuse on Linux
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d2c8555e-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:53:49AM +0000, Pavel Klinkovsky wrote:
> Results of my measurements ('ls' in sources repository)
>=20
> Native Plan9:
> 1.05 s - very stable results
>=20
> Native Linux:
> 40-75 s - very spread results
>=20
> My "10x slower" estimation was too optimistic.
>=20
> Pavel
>=20
That's a really long time for ls. With 2.6.31.6, for me ls takes about 5s.

--=20
I am a man who does not exist for others.

--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkt1D2MACgkQdg8JTBUsaI6WlACePQnqvDUSp3ZPZOSh988UtQMs
jpwAn3d7XWGg3cfomhygIWMxmGhXTC4V
=RSYx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C--