From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:36:48 -0400
From: Jacob Todd <jaketodd422@gmail.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <20100326013648.GA9563@zoidberg.hsd1.mi.comcast.net>
References: <20100325114948.GA7249@polynum.com>
	<20100325114948.GA7249@polynum.com>
	<twig.1269564722.70572@swcp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <twig.1269564722.70572@swcp.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [9fans] Man pages for add-ons
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f319c464-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 06:52:02PM -0600, EBo wrote:
>=20
> > i vote for putting the binaries in /$objtype/bin or /$objtype/bin/tex.
> > in the latter case, it would be tex/tex or tex/mf.
>=20
> I'm a total plan9 newbie, but I hate polluting / with every single
> application.  I do prefer to have all apps in a single package directory=
=20
> /$some_dir/$objtype/bin  where $some_dir is /opt, /pkg, /contrib, etc.  I=
 do
> not know if this would fit in well with the plan9 way though...
>=20
You wouldn't be `polluting' / with every single application. Binaries would
either go in $user/bin and would be then be bind-ed to /bin, or binaries wo=
uld
just go in /$objtype/bin. No `pollution' here.

--=20
I am a man who does not exist for others.

--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkusD7AACgkQdg8JTBUsaI5SXwCeMVnbXc43HmuTYNyisYFEdKmG
oLMAoIDw7vkLQjSbXqfGYPquMI10wFqZ
=q0UG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--