From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:07:07 -0400 From: Jacob Todd To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <20100330020707.GA10866@zoidberg.hsd1.mi.comcast.net> References: <138575261003230627kb81c42q7710df1af4283919@mail.gmail.com> <201003291720.32633.corey@bitworthy.net> <93b909d2c8147deb5026860ed6cf0c5b@ladd.quanstro.net> <201003291821.54838.corey@bitworthy.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201003291821.54838.corey@bitworthy.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan ? (was: native install) Topicbox-Message-UUID: f831bab0-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:21:54PM -0700, Corey wrote: > Are the core Plan 9 design concepts in fact ineffective or unsuitable for > building a general purpose computing environment? >=20 > I find that very hard to believe - but there's over 15 years of evidence= =20 > which seems to imply just that. There's fifteen years of evidence of people *not* applying the core Plan 9 concepts to anything. Not applying a concept isn't proof it's ``ineffective= '' or ``unsuitable''. >=20 > No one's willing to spearhead a "General Purpose 9" experiment, and no=20 > one's interested in collaborating on and contributing to such a project? It would seem not. We're happy here, where things are sane. >=20 > "If you want [general purpose], you know where to get it." seems to > be the period that ends all such discussion. >=20 --=20 I am a man who does not exist for others. --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuxXMsACgkQdg8JTBUsaI4xEgCfd95QuKjJb3rwWGEUhFfH9fg9 ivIAn0+utJlfFAMzah3tNwHNRFy0RMyJ =oPmA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--