From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tlaronde@polynum.com Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:27:05 +0200 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20100416072705.GA1111@polynum.com> References: <20100415182618.GA9844@polynum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: [9fans] APE: a further note. Topicbox-Message-UUID: 02faa1c8-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:30:15PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote: > > gcc(1) is very verbose (well: I always set -Wall). ken-cc > > is---surprise---more laconic; but when he was saying: no! he was right, > > for things that were going silently under NetBSD. > > compile with -FVTw. -T causes type signatures to be > emitted. the linker won't link mismatched type signatures. > i've found this to be very useful. Thanks: I will add the flags by default in the Plan9 parameter file in my framework. Even if it does not catch all, it will help. -- Thierry Laronde http://www.kergis.com/ Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C