From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Corey To: 9fans@9fans.net Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 18:21:15 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.34-rc4; KDE/4.4.3; i686; ; ) References: <201005132122.08832.corey@bitworthy.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201005151821.15456.corey@bitworthy.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] boot errors using most recent plan9.iso Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2317d6ec-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Saturday 15 May 2010 5:25:38 erik quanstrom wrote: > > ... but I'm wondering: why does 9load seem to sometimes suffer > > from apparent regressions in the official iso? > > i think the bios calls that the official distribution > supports have been the source of a lot of trouble. > i've been looking into why that might be, but don't > have any answers yet. > Roger that: I can confirm that the install went just fine using your iso's in lieu of the current official iso. (I had used the official iso several months ago on the very same machine, and had no issue... which is what led me to wondering about 9load regressions in the official distro). Cheers