From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:17:26 +0200 From: Lucio De Re To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20100630081726.GA19323@mutter.proxima.alt.za> References: <464534aea8c7fffa248a1368c41acb55@proxima.alt.za> <19b728d48aa74d67b8402c1b9727c80e@coraid.com> <0ab4e0867c119e024b86176ede4cd12e@ladd.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [9fans] Go/Inferno toolchain (Was: comment and newline in Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3acad6cc-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 04:00:09PM -0700, Russ Cox wrote: > > i think people get too hung up on trying to make > the port back perfect. just make it work. > then make it better. > But it's the toolchain I'm after. I like Go a lot, but I feel that a viable toolchain that produces ELF files for Linux is also a worthy objective. And getting the toolchain to produce Plan 9 executable code has already been done, albeit unchecked and about to be lost or forgotten on a server a long way from here. Still, I'd be thrilled to be able to cut my teeth on Go on Plan 9 rather than UBUNTU, so don't let me discourage anyone. I just want 9fans to know that I'm willing to do the slog work to keep the toolchains in sync and they shouldn't go out of their way to make my life unnecessarily difficult :-) ++L