From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:38:01 +0200 From: Lucio De Re To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20100911173801.GF4113@fangle.proxima.alt.za> References: <20100911070236.GB4113@fangle.proxima.alt.za> <20100911071423.GC4113@fangle.proxima.alt.za> <20100911171823.GE4113@fangle.proxima.alt.za> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [9fans] 9VX failure Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5453d0e4-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:24:05AM -0700, ron minnich wrote: > >> > > Is that included in rminnich/vx32, where default compilation fails with > > a missing "pcap.h"? > > the pcap.h thing is unrelated and I think I'm going to change it so > that it builds default with no pcap support, since I'm not the only > person seeing this build error. > > no, I have to get his patch included. I had a question in to his > customer support people about the patch first before i went with the > patch :-) > That means that there are two patches required here: Charles' adjustment (why have I not seen it, I wonder) and the pcap.h thing. Can you post them here in the interim? I'm not sure I want to know why pcap.h is being included and not found... ++L