From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:20:09 +0200
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20101029132008.GD2344@fangle.proxima.alt.za>
References: <AANLkTinhzWx+-t95OsqRZ=_5WZFjcpG33H-imyq4a6-V@mail.gmail.com>
	<35dbd2d8996bf96d65c969836bd2e172@terzarima.net>
	<AANLkTikpTFWnFM-gQ88dkHcpe1kgP90x1VCcLGLDd_Fo@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikpTFWnFM-gQ88dkHcpe1kgP90x1VCcLGLDd_Fo@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [9fans] A little more ado about async Tclunk
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 719847ac-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 02:12:11PM +0100, roger peppe wrote:
>
> so this trick is unsafe in general, but might be ok sometimes.

So is the answer to add semantics to Topen or add a Treopen that obviates
the Tclunk?

++L