From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:44:58 +1100." References: <94b72a275de4f8e6440aa79508edb7a4@terzarima.net> <8426d01eb3f1d86b5f9e8a50efb3e8c6@ladd.quanstro.net> <4EC7A160-58E6-4798-A2DC-62985F4806A7@gmail.com> From: Bakul Shah Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:31:17 -0700 Message-Id: <20101029223117.D663C5B18@mail.bitblocks.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] A little more ado about async Tclunk Topicbox-Message-UUID: 731467dc-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 See EWD108 "Een algorithme ter voorkoming van de dodelijke omarming." (An algorithm to avoid the deadly embrace.) in which Dijkstra describes his Bankers algorithm. 1965 or earlier. Of course, you may be looking at deadly embrace from a different point of view. On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:44:58 +1100 Bruce Ellis wrote: > that definition is wrong! > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Gorka Guardiola wrote: > > > > On Oct 29, 2010, at 10:27 PM, Bruce Ellis wrote: > > > >> back to school for roger > >> > >> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 6:33 AM, roger peppe wrote: > >>> On 29 October 2010 18:47, Bruce Ellis wrote: > >>>> who said deadlock. it's an easily reproducible situation. rattle the > >>>> cage is not a solution. > >>> > >>> sorry then, i misunderstood you. what else did you mean by "deadly embrac > e"? > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > I need to go back to school with him too. > > > > http://www.olc.edu/~cdelong/jargon-4.4.7/jargon-4.4.7/html/D/deadly-embrace > .html > > > > Unless it is again some obscure reference... > > >