From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:40:31 -0500 From: Nathaniel W Filardo To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20101115174031.GH21298@gradx.cs.jhu.edu> References: <20101114224925.GB21298@gradx.cs.jhu.edu> <081ad47d62311a4a160875fc8bc9247f@coraid.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OWHXb1mYLuhj1Ox" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <081ad47d62311a4a160875fc8bc9247f@coraid.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Subject: Re: [9fans] p9p factotum available for plan 9 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 80449cf6-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --0OWHXb1mYLuhj1Ox Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:22:52AM -0500, erik quanstrom wrote: > > > How do you map it to a local identity? > >=20 > > There's less need to, since most rights checks would be done using the = key > > directly, but eve's factotum also probably has a SPKI key, and your ide= ntity > > can be stringified into a path of names if necessary. >=20 > in that case, what do you do with the username? do you have > to change username if you rekey? Hm; I wasn't thinking about rekeying. You're free to use the path from eve's factotum, which may go via a local naming authority, if you like. Then the authority simply changes its view of names in response to your rekeying and everything stays the same. --nwf; --0OWHXb1mYLuhj1Ox Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzhcI8ACgkQTeQabvr9Tc9/aQCcDFPhSVip5w6i2olN6NNoHQiE KTQAn13KZ5uI+AghW3S/iD++hDu3IQV7 =9tWd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OWHXb1mYLuhj1Ox--