From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:07:56 +0200 From: Lucio De Re To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20101125100756.GH2830@fangle.proxima.alt.za> References: <1c6db06e-3424-4c8c-9cd9-a4d0e66ffe2a@l32g2000yqc.googlegroups.co> <67e136a416a92ae66580b7fcdb1e0546@plug.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] Video mode problem after installation on QEMU Topicbox-Message-UUID: 862fd2ac-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 09:46:15AM +0000, Artem Novikov wrote: > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:46:15 GMT > From: Artem Novikov > To: 9fans@9fans.net > Subject: Re: [9fans] Video mode problem after installation on QEMU >=20 > On 24 =D0=BD=D0=BE=D1=8F, 20:52, quans...@quanstro.net (erik quanstrom)= wrote: > 1. I compared the files plan9.ini.cd and plan9.ini, and no significant > differences are found >=20 > *nomp=3D1 This one has far-reaching effects. I presume it is not set in the installed system? Erik actually pointed that out in his message. > *nobiosload=3D1 > *nodumpstack=3D1 >=20 > 2. After installing the monitor =3D ask and vgasize =3D ask, was loaded > into the default mode 640x480x8 (xga) > 3. vga, vesa does not work > 4. Maybe there is some difference in the kernels? >=20 > plan9.ini.cd > bootfile=3DsdD0!cdboot!9pcflop.gz >=20 > plan9.ini > bootfile=3DsdC0!9fat!9pcf >=20 Not likely, they are derived from the same code base. If differences can be identified, they should probably be eliminated. But it's hard to look. The real difference is the inclusion of a RAMdisk in pcflop, if memory serves. ++L